I am just wondering where this thread got "hi-jacked" into what it is now? It was originally meant for a WW II veteran and his "problem" with proving his heritage.
"I'm pretty sure from what you said, you don't know what the bill does or how it works."
*sigh* because i got my info from the immigration acts website and it "was wrong". its speculation of what could have happened. listen we dont have to agree or disagree on anything but when you make smartass comments like the one above thats when people get pissed off at you. I dont care on the other hand, it just kills me that you think that anyone who even sits in between on issues is the personification of a tea party member. Thanks for the info though, ill compare it to what i have looked at before and figure out what is going on FOR MYSELF, i dont need to agree with what every other centrist tells me.
If you aren't a liberal at 20 you have no heart. If you aren't a conservative at 40 you have no brain.
WINSTON CHURCHILL
so where do i sit? thank you very much for your insight though R13 i appreciate it man.
Cant we all just get along?
It's not my problem how you took that because I'm through with the tussle back and forth with explaining myself when everyone takes comments like that as cockiness or calling them stupid...when I've really never called anyone stupid on here, I've said somethings they've posted and said were stupid because I do...it's usually outlandish things. When you posted all of what you have on it, then what else am I supposed to think? The comment never said you were dumb or wasn't capable of understanding it, just that you don't or just going off the myths surrounds the bill.
No one called you a tea-party member or anything, but what you have claimed were conservative claims and didn't have any basis to them, then in the first comment you brought it up you said I was wrong about that.
Huhhhh? I was talking about voters, not candidates?
__________________
It seemed like the thread could use a little humor.
We'll keep the lights on for you.
Spuds
In essence, if you work for the candidates, you are working for the voters. Afterall, that is who ultimately will be employing the candidate.
Lol that's a stretch if there has ever been one.Doubt he meant that anyway, he just didn't make sense.
Bookmarks